Meeting Time: 07:00 AM PT / 03:00 PM UTC (See call time in different zones)
BRIDGE: https://zoom.us/j/808329801?pwd=b2pmd3dQZitkSDlsQkNGMTd3K09yZz09
Meeting Recording: TBA
(Example of collaborative meeting minutes, using Presos/Notes/Links: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/TSC+2020-03-12)
Attendance
| Attended | Proxy (w/ @name) | Gov. Holiday | Did Not Attend |
|---|
Attendance is taken purely upon #info in Zoom Chat
| Fujitsu | Ampere Computing | |||
| Alicon | Red Hat | |||
| Zenlayer | China Unicom | |||
| Signalogic | Intel | |||
| Huawei | Juniper | |||
| Baidu | PGTalk | |||
| Tencent | Socnoc AI Inc. | |||
| Raeden | Arm | |||
| Equinix | Salesforce | |||
| AT&T | China Mobile Research Institute |
Time | Agenda Items | Presented By | Presos/Notes Kuralamudhan Ramakrishnan /Links/ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30 | Tuesday Guest talkThe Design and Application of Baetyl | Guest speaker Leding Li invited by TSC member Yu, Liya | Key points:
Questions: Q: Jeff Brower How model run with different architecture. is the optimization is taken care of. A: Leding - should be taking into consideration, only computer vision uses cases are taken into the consideration Q: Ike Alisson How to bring the standard into this solution A: Leding - There are around 100 vendors getting such standard is very difficult. |
| 10 | Akraino Hackathon Logistic discussion | Kuralamudhan Ramakrishnan | Oleg Berzin what's the difference between the google doc created for the discussion? Why we should look into the different venues, let take the one suggested by the MEC community itself? Kuralamudhan Ramakrishnan Wants to see the structure in how the hackathon is conducted to see stakeholder and volunteers structure. Like to do the brainstorm as the community on various pros and cons of the venue. Want to see the success criteria for the event, don't want the event to be "yet another event" with no impact. The purpose of the document is to have the structure of why we taking the action and what our end goals for the hackathon are. Getting the sponsor required a structured document with success criteria, the impact of the hackathon, and why the actions are taken? The sponsor required these items for the sponsorship. Kuralamudhan Ramakrishnan took an action item to sync up with Oleg on the difference and come up with the standard solution and understand the urgency on this ? who is driving the urgency here. |
| 20 | Akraino's annual review | Akraino - Stage 3 - 2022-02-09 DraftMoved to next TSC meeting | |
10 | PTL Updates
|
Action Items (Open Action Item Tracker) ( Kuralamudhan Ramakrishnan )
- 02/10 Kuralamudhan Ramakrishnan Setup a meeting with Tina Tsou and Oleg Berzin on the Hackathon Logistic discussion
Votes (template below)
Zoom Chat Log
Voting Template
TSC Voting to Approve XYZ:
Motion:
Second:
| SL No. | Voting Member | Member Company | Y/N/A |
| 1 | Fujitsu | ||
| 2 | Alicon | ||
| 3 | Zenlayer | ||
| 4 | Signalogic | ||
| 5 | Huawei | ||
| 6 | Baidu | ||
| 7 | Tencent | ||
| 8 | Raedon | ||
| 9 | Equinix | ||
| 10 | (w/ Paul Carver ) | AT&T | |
| 11 | Ampere Computing | ||
| 12 | Red Hat | ||
| 13 | China Unicom | ||
| 14 | Intel | ||
| 15 | Juniper | ||
| 16 | PGTalk | ||
| 17 | Socnoc AI Inc. | ||
| 18 | Arm | ||
| 19 | Salesforce | ||
| 20 | China Mobile Research Institute |